Pros And Cons Of Symphony Lens

Pros And Cons Of Symphony Lens

Symphony lens is a multifocal lens which allows a person to see at a distance with closer objects being out of focus.

Cataract surgery mostly uses symphony lens since it has features which improve both the range and quality of vision.

Multifocal lenses use diffractive technology to give simultaneous vision by splitting light into multiple distinct foci. The symphony lens merges technologies to achieve these goals. The proprietary chelate design elongates the focus of the eye in order to give the extended vision.

The new findings suggest symphony is more advantageous over older IOLs. In July 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of symphony lens.  The symphony lens is a multifocal lens that provides clear visions at all distances.

The benefit of symphony lens provides our Philadelphia, PA, patients with an intraocular lens that stands out from others on the markets and offers superior vision results. There are several advantages of symphony lens which include;

 

PROS:

1. Clear vision at all distances: symphony lens is a multifocal lens that corrects both near and distance vision. Most multifocal lenses have breaks that make transitions between various distances a little rough. Individuals with healthy eyes will benefit from clear, dependable vision at all distances.

2. Reduced glares and halos: Halos and glares are significantly reduced in multifocal IOLs. The symphony lens is designed to provide a smooth transition from day to night vision, with minimal visual abnormalities. After recovering from cataract surgery, patients with symphony lens report little to know halos or glares.

3. Less dependence on prescription lenses: When a person receives a traditional IOL it treats distant vision. The patient can wear glasses for reading and other up-close tasks. However, this is uncommon for those with multifocal IOL to reach for reading glasses. Patients who receive the symphony lens typically do not depend on reading glasses to perform closer task thus little need for prescription lenses.

4. Can live a healthy and active lifestyle: Once you recover from cataract surgery, you will be able to live an active and healthy life. Your full range of vision will be restored making it easy to read, drive, and do other activities.

5. High patient satisfaction: Patient with visual problems can gain their sight by using symphony lenses. It provides a clear vision to longer distance making them feel satisfied.

6. Seamless day-to-night vision: Patient with poor night sight benefits from symphony lenses. It provides clear night and day vision to longer distances.

7Reduces need for intermediate and distance spectacles: Traditional mono-focal IOLs are designed to restore far or distances vision. Symphony lenses provide quality vision at multiple distances hence it eliminates the need for glasses.

8. No maintenance required: They provide lasting results since these lenses are planted in the eye. Symphony lenses don’t need any maintenance nor replacement when scratched.

9. Saves money: Unlike glasses that are replaced every now and then, symphony lenses save money. Once paid for and implanted, you don’t incur any extra cost of replacement.

10. Provides multiple distinct foci: Multifocal lenses use different technologies to give simultaneous vision by splitting light into multiple distinct foci.

 

CONS:

1. Blurry vision: Multifocal lenses makes it difficult to see up close. It gives blurry vision when one is reading books.

2.Contrast after cataract surgery: After cataract surgery, the symphony lens makes reading in dim light difficult. Reading using symphony lenses in dim light may result in another difficult vision problem.

3. Existence of glare and halos to some patience: Small number of patients who receive multifocal lenses experience glares and Halos around lights after dark. This makes driving at night difficult.

4. Expensive to acquire: Multifocal lenses are more expensive than monofocal lenses and glasses. This makes it difficult for patients with low income to acquire them.

5. Uneasy to replace: Symphony lenses are implanted to last for longer periods after cataract surgery. Once destroyed, it is not easy to replace them.

6. High risk during cataract surgery: Operating an eye is a risky operation. During surgery, a slight mistake by surgeons may lead to patients losing the sight permanently.

7. View number of cataract surgeons: Cataract surgeon experts are few and not evenly distributed across the world. Patients in developing and third world countries face challenges in accessing the services of cataract surgery and implantation of symphony lens.

8. May increase complications: Symphony lens may not be adaptable to some of the patients and may increase complications of visions and the sight of the affected patients.

9. Longer initial examination: It takes longer to examine before the patient undergoes cataract surgery. The patient may have vision problems before the implant takes place.

10. Require regular office visit for follow-up: Regular visit to experts for a check-up is a waste of time and also a waste of money for costs like transportation to required offices.

This Post Has 14 Comments

  1. Gil

    I have had the Symphony Lens in for a year and a half. The blurry vision never went away.

  2. Patti Ellsworth

    I have a Symphony lens in my right eye and now need cataract surgery in my left eye! Do I need to get another Symphony or can I opt for a standard lens?

  3. Katherine

    I had Symfony lenses implanted in June 2020 in both eyes and have not been happy! Besides destroying my night vision — I have what look like bursts when I look at ANY light at night while driving, I also have glare looking at my computer screen and the TV. I find myself closing my left eye to reduce the glare. Looking for a solution. Don’t want to think I have to live the rest of my life with this problem!

  4. Jim

    These lenses are dark hole you have to continually dump money into. I have had mine for 1 year and so far have spent nearly $14,000.00 with no end in sight. I feel like I was better off with bifocals.
    Friends who got the Medicare lens with a $150.00 deductible can’t understand why I continually have to go back for “tune ups” after spending so much money when they don’t have to.

  5. Janet S

    I had Symphony implanted in my right eye in Sept. 2020. My vision is much worse than when I had the cataract. I have a lot of difficulty reading any road signs. I still have halo’s around oncoming traffic headlights. I no longer can see a 45″ tv at a 13 foot distance. This has not only been a total waste of money but I am wondering what can possibly be done to help me see better.

  6. Dwight

    My vision was better before surgery. Had surgery more than 2 months ago but it isn’t safe to try to drive at night and distance vision during the day isn’t good either.

  7. Jim

    It isn’t going to get any better. After 14 months, I’m still having procedures to try and correct a haze over my cornea in both eyes. It amazes me that they keep selling these things and that doctors keep using them.

  8. Kim L

    The surgery went fine but I am super disappointed with the results. Can’t see to drive safely nor watch tv very good. Had to get glasses to help. I still have halos with night driving. Way too much money with unsatisfactory result.

  9. ray

    Thanks for reviews. Was thinking of getting these lenses.

  10. Ray

    This is so unforgivable for all you folks who have posted your stories. They have recalls on cars that do not wok properly but the medical field gets a pass until a class action suite when the lawyers get all the money. I have been told that I need cataract surgery but after reading all the horror stories online I will pass until I reach the state where I can’t function. Again so sorry to hear your stories, wish there was something I could do. God Bless

  11. SippingCoffee

    I have had my Symphony Multifocal toric lenses since 2017. I wish I could say I love them. But quite the opposite is true. I am so, so disappointed and so regret my decision. I went with symphony because I was on the youngerside for cateract surgery. I had decided to do laser, but the eye dr. I was at said they would not do it as I had cataracts, so I went with this option. The concentric rings and the light bursts, have ruined my night vision– LED lights especially. I have young children and teens and I do regret this decision. On top of that the surgeon, while I paid for all upgrades, misaligned my toric lense and my astigmatism is worse. The haze is real. Not seeing the TV as clearly is real. And people or items are so hard to see when they have a window behind them. Is this true of all lenses?

  12. Tom

    I had a Symphony lens implanted 3 years ago. It was painful after the surgery and I was almost blind in that eye. I was told give it 24hrs, then 48, then 1 week, 1month etc. After 8 weeks the Dr? decided to remove the lens. After the less expensive lens was implanted my retina became swollen for and I was unable to see for months I’m still wearing bi-focals and my right eye is constantly changing so a new prescription is needed every 6 months. the problem was started by the dangerous Symphony lens but the rest I believe was caused by an incompatent Dr?.

  13. Cindy

    I am sad to hear all your stories about the Symphony lens not working for you. My husband had both eyes implanted with Symphony lens. First one and then the other the next week. He has had no problem. No complaints.

  14. Jim

    Early days.
    18 months in and 4 additional surgeries and still more in the future.
    Buy the Medicare lens and keep wearing glasses. Save thousands of dollars and many years of “tweaking ” surgery.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.